Review a project, request corrections and record progress

Keep feedback, corrections, decisions and development updates together in the application history.

Step by step

1. Appointed reviewer: open a submitted application in Architectural review, read its saved property details and documents, and move it to Under review when examination starts. Board membership does not automatically grant this committee permission.

2. Record useful feedback. Where appropriate, add an official Texas statute reference or cite the association’s governing document and section. Review the source, applicability and document version rather than relying on a citation label alone.

3. If clarification or a revised plan is needed, request changes and explain what must be corrected. A denial must explain the basis and required changes; do not treat a request for corrections as a substitute for a denial notice.

4. Owner: read the feedback, edit the returned application, review contact details and attachments, then resubmit. Each saved action and submission preserves the history; a resubmission is a new review step, not automatic approval.

5. Reviewer: approve only after completing the association’s authorized review. Approval moves the project to Ready to start. Record In progress and then Completed with a meaningful update as development advances.

6. If another participant has changed the record, reload and review the latest version before saving again. Do not repeatedly submit an old decision after a conflict.